How to Lie with Statistics

448 indexed citations

Abstract

About

This paper, published in 1954, received 448 indexed citations. Written by Darrell Huff and Irving Geis covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (101 citations), Sociology and Political Science (64 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (61 citations). Published in Internet Archive (Internet Archive).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w83787235 →

Countries where authors are citing How to Lie with Statistics

Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of How to Lie with Statistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How to Lie with Statistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How to Lie with Statistics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing How to Lie with Statistics

Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of How to Lie with Statistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the How to Lie with Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w83787235.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Aristolochic acid and the etiology of endemic (Balkan) nephropathy Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Prospective mapping of viral mutations that escape antibodies used to treat COVID-19 Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper A Critical Approach to Evaluating Clinical Efficacy, Adverse Events and Drug Interactions of Herbal Remedies Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Novel Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Does the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty? Results of the MERCATOR study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angioplasty to Prevent Transluminal Coronary Obstruction and Restenosis (MERCATOR) Study Group. Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Fully Convolutional Geometric Features Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Supercontinuum Generation in Optical Fibers Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Metal Organic Framework Derived Materials: Progress and Prospects for the Energy Conversion and Storage Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution with BayesSpace