Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics
- Authors
- Guillermo O’Donnell
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83716301 →Countries where authors are citing Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics
This map shows the geographic impact of Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics
This network shows the impact of Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics.
About Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: studies in South American politics
This paper, published in 1973, received 626 indexed citations . Written by Guillermo O’Donnell. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (427 citations), Political Science and International Relations (377 citations) and Development (112 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83716301.