Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient

981 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1993, received 981 indexed citations. Written by T.J. Wong and Siew Hong Teoh covering the research area of Finance and Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Accounting (935 citations), Strategy and Management (440 citations) and Finance (294 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8356493 →

Countries where authors are citing Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8356493.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026