Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures
- Authors
- Francine Shapiro
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83330704 →Countries where authors are citing Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures
This map shows the geographic impact of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures
This network shows the impact of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures.
About Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Francine Shapiro. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (941 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (177 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (165 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83330704.