PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
- Authors
- David L. Swofford
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83206374 →Countries where authors are citing PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
This map shows the geographic impact of PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
This network shows the impact of PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8.
About PAUP^* : Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods) 4.0b8
This paper, published in 2001, received 12.0k indexed citations . Written by David L. Swofford covering the research area of Genetics, Molecular Biology and Paleontology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (4.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.7k citations) and Plant Science (3.2k citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83206374.