Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan
- Authors
- Janice Boddy
- Journal
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83116878 →Countries where authors are citing Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan
This map shows the geographic impact of Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan
This network shows the impact of Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan.
About Wombs and alien spirits : women, men and the Zār cult in northern Sudan
This paper, published in 1989, received 218 indexed citations . Written by Janice Boddy covering the research area of General Social Sciences, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (108 citations), Anthropology (88 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (46 citations). Published in Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83116878.