The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker
- Authors
- Katherine J. Cramer
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w83035937 →Countries where authors are citing The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker
This map shows the geographic impact of The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker
This network shows the impact of The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker.
About The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker
This paper, published in 2016, received 250 indexed citations . Written by Katherine J. Cramer covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (142 citations), Political Science and International Relations (133 citations) and Communication (47 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w83035937.