The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science

398 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 398 indexed citations. Written by Shaun Gallagher and Dan Zahavi covering the research area of Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (174 citations), Social Psychology (157 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (118 citations). Published in Research Online (University of Wollongong).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w82837964 →

Countries where authors are citing The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w82837964.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026