Journal of Spatial Information Science
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Nedjeljko Frančula
- Journal
- Kartografija i geoinformacije
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w827861 →Countries where authors are citing Journal of Spatial Information Science
This map shows the geographic impact of Journal of Spatial Information Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Journal of Spatial Information Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Spatial Information Science more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Journal of Spatial Information Science
This network shows the impact of Journal of Spatial Information Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Journal of Spatial Information Science.
About Journal of Spatial Information Science
This paper, published in 2011, received 344 indexed citations . Written by Nedjeljko Frančula covering the research area of Geography, Planning and Development. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geography, Planning and Development (175 citations), Signal Processing (114 citations), Transportation (113 citations), Sociology and Political Science (39 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (39 citations). Published in Kartografija i geoinformacije.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w827861.