Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education
- Authors
- Thomas S. PopkewitzMarie Brennan
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w82685493 →Countries where authors are citing Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education
This map shows the geographic impact of Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education
This network shows the impact of Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education.
About Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education
This paper, published in 1997, received 417 indexed citations . Written by Thomas S. Popkewitz and Marie Brennan covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (231 citations), Sociology and Political Science (227 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (101 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w82685493.