Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review.
- Authors
- Betsy B SinghSimon Dagenais
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w82660719 →Countries where authors are citing Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review.
This map shows the geographic impact of Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review.
This network shows the impact of Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review..
About Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Withania somnifera (ashwagandha): a review.
This paper, published in 2000, received 615 indexed citations . Written by Betsy B Singh and Simon Dagenais covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Complementary and alternative medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Complementary and alternative medicine (487 citations), Molecular Biology (129 citations) and Plant Science (102 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w82660719.