Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Alan RitterOren Etzioni
- Journal
- Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8249731 →Countries where authors are citing Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study
This map shows the geographic impact of Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study
This network shows the impact of Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study.
About Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study
This paper, published in 2011, received 764 indexed citations . Written by Alan Ritter and Oren Etzioni covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (642 citations), Information Systems (213 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (110 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (64 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (48 citations). Published in Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8249731.