71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY.

365 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1963, received 365 indexed citations. Written by Donald C. Collins covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (344 citations), Emergency Medicine (247 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (161 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w82251762 →

Countries where authors are citing 71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of 71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by 71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites 71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing 71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of 71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the 71,000 HUMAN APPENDIX SPECIMENS. A FINAL REPORT, SUMMARIZING FORTY YEARS' STUDY..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w82251762.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026