NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem

790 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1996, received 790 indexed citations. Written by Francisco J. Varela covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (494 citations), Social Psychology (272 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (188 citations). Published in Journal of Consciousness Studies.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w8219988 →

Countries where authors are citing NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w8219988.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026