Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction
Impact in
- Authors
- Nelson PhillipsCynthia Hardy
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w81122879 →Countries where authors are citing Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction
This map shows the geographic impact of Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction
This network shows the impact of Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction.
About Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction
This paper, published in 2002, received 693 indexed citations . Written by Nelson Phillips and Cynthia Hardy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (255 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (187 citations), Strategy and Management (109 citations), Political Science and International Relations (79 citations) and Communication (74 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w81122879.