Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
- Authors
- A. P. Dempster
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8063610 →Countries where authors are citing Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
This map shows the geographic impact of Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
This network shows the impact of Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.
About Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
This paper, published in 1977, received 3.7k indexed citations . Written by A. P. Dempster covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (1.3k citations), Statistics and Probability (713 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (567 citations). Published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8063610.