Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants

611 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1993, received 611 indexed citations. Written by Edith L. Taylor, Thomas N. Taylor and Michael Krings covering the research area of Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (499 citations), Molecular Biology (237 citations) and Plant Science (167 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w80321624 →

Countries where authors are citing Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w80321624.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026