Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w79903108 →Countries where authors are citing Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide
This map shows the geographic impact of Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide
This network shows the impact of Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide.
About Templates for the Solution of Algebraic Eigenvalue Problems: A Practical Guide
This paper, published in 1987, received 739 indexed citations . Written by James Demmel, Jack Dongarra, Axel Ruhe, Henk van der Vorst and Zhaojun Bai covering the research area of Numerical Analysis and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (366 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (252 citations) and Numerical Analysis (173 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w79903108.