Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy.
Impact in
- Epidemiology 275
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w79848215 →Countries where authors are citing Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy.
This map shows the geographic impact of Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy.
This network shows the impact of Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy..
About Latent Pneumocystis infection of rats, relapse, and chemotherapy.
This paper, published in 1966, received 292 indexed citations . Written by J. K. Frenkel, Joshua Good and Jeremiah Shultz covering the research area of Epidemiology, Genetics and Infectious Diseases. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (275 citations), Infectious Diseases (165 citations), Organic Chemistry (58 citations), Parasitology (29 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (25 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w79848215.