Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building
- Authors
- Roger W. CobbCharles D. Elder
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w79823815 →Countries where authors are citing Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building
This map shows the geographic impact of Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building
This network shows the impact of Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building.
About Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building
This paper, published in 1975, received 944 indexed citations . Written by Roger W. Cobb and Charles D. Elder. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (454 citations), Sociology and Political Science (290 citations), Strategy and Management (194 citations), Communication (147 citations) and Public Administration (139 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w79823815.