Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w79519850 →Countries where authors are citing Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.
This map shows the geographic impact of Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.
This network shows the impact of Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w79519850.