Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right

431 indexed citations
published 2011
Journal
John Wiley eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7946155 →

Countries where authors are citing Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right.

About Managing business ethics : straight talk about how to do it right

This paper, published in 2011, received 431 indexed citations . Written by Linda Klebe Treviño and Katherine A. Nelson covering the research area of Information Systems and Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems and Management (258 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (152 citations) and Strategy and Management (129 citations). Published in John Wiley eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7946155.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026