Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w79328935 →Countries where authors are citing Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment
This map shows the geographic impact of Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment
This network shows the impact of Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment.
About Handbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment
This paper, published in 1999, received 791 indexed citations . Written by Maura Mitrushina, Kyle B. Boone and Louis F. D'Elia. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (343 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (312 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (133 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w79328935.