Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples

539 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 539 indexed citations. Written by Per Runeson, Martin Höst, Austen Rainer and Björn Regnell covering the research area of Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (419 citations), Artificial Intelligence (154 citations) and Computer Science Applications (129 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w78646267 →

Countries where authors are citing Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w78646267.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Acetylation by Tip60 Is Required for Selective Histone Variant Exchange at DNA Lesions Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Bottom-Up Ecosystem Trophic Dynamics Determine Fish Production in the Northeast Pacific Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Nicotine Activation of α4* Receptors: Sufficient for Reward, Tolerance, and Sensitization Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Biosynthesis and Export of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper CD19 + CD24 hi CD38 hi B Cells Maintain Regulatory T Cells While Limiting T H 1 and T H 17 Differentiation Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Antibiotic efficacy is linked to bacterial cellular respiration Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Activation of the PTEN/mTOR/STAT3 pathway in breast cancer stem-like cells is required for viability and maintenance Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Understanding Back-Translation at Scale
Rankless by CCL
2026