Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases.
Impact in
- Rheumatology 177
Classified as
- Authors
- David C. DahlinMark B. Coventry
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w78539317 →Countries where authors are citing Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases.
This map shows the geographic impact of Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases.
This network shows the impact of Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases..
About Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases.
This paper, published in 1967, received 382 indexed citations . Written by David C. Dahlin and Mark B. Coventry covering the research area of Rheumatology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oral Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (310 citations), Rheumatology (177 citations), Oncology (102 citations), Surgery (93 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (54 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w78539317.