A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks

346 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 346 indexed citations. Written by Asela Gunawardana and Guy Shani covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (271 citations), Artificial Intelligence (137 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (91 citations). Published in Journal of Machine Learning Research.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7844169 →

Countries where authors are citing A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Survey of Accuracy Evaluation Metrics of Recommendation Tasks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7844169.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026