Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w78410845 →Countries where authors are citing Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains
This map shows the geographic impact of Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains
This network shows the impact of Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains.
About Blockstack: a Global naming and storage system secured by blockchains
This paper, published in 2016, received 247 indexed citations . Written by Muneeb Ali, Jude Nelson, Ryan Shea and Michael J. Freedman covering the research area of Information Systems and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (213 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (148 citations), Artificial Intelligence (102 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (20 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (14 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w78410845.