Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7811123 →Countries where authors are citing Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
This map shows the geographic impact of Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
This network shows the impact of Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion.
About Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
This paper, published in 2017, received 269 indexed citations . Written by Rick Cummings, Eugene Agichtein and Evgeniy Gabrilovich covering the research area of Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (139 citations), Information Systems (110 citations), Sociology and Political Science (53 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (37 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (26 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7811123.