Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w77998131 →Countries where authors are citing Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review.
This map shows the geographic impact of Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review.
This network shows the impact of Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review..
About Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review.
This paper, published in 2002, received 794 indexed citations . Written by Rudolf Kaaks, Annekatrin Lukanova and Mindy S. Kurzer covering the research area of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (378 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (323 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (214 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w77998131.