Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report

217 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2015, received 217 indexed citations. Written by Joshua C. Hall, Robert A. Lawson and JAMES D. GWARTNEY covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (107 citations), Sociology and Political Science (90 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (48 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w77819064 →

Countries where authors are citing Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Economic Freedom of the World: 2015 Annual Report.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w77819064.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026