The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7766403 →Countries where authors are citing The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada
This map shows the geographic impact of The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada
This network shows the impact of The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada.
About The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada
This paper, published in 1958, received 585 indexed citations . Written by H. A. Gleason and Nathaniel Lord Britton covering the research area of Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (457 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (266 citations) and Ecology (124 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7766403.