Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits
- Authors
- Francis C. Yeh
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7724293 →Countries where authors are citing Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits
This map shows the geographic impact of Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits
This network shows the impact of Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits.
About Population genetic analysis of codominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits
This paper, published in 1997, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Francis C. Yeh. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (584 citations), Plant Science (503 citations) and Molecular Biology (288 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7724293.