Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7708408 →Countries where authors are citing Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States
This map shows the geographic impact of Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States
This network shows the impact of Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States.
About Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States
This paper, published in 1992, received 568 indexed citations . Written by Joshua Lederberg, Robert E. Shope and Stanley C. Oaks covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (265 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (264 citations), Epidemiology (89 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (77 citations) and General Health Professions (54 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7708408.