The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems
- Authors
- James F. Moore
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w77080684 →Countries where authors are citing The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems
This map shows the geographic impact of The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems
This network shows the impact of The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems.
About The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems
This paper, published in 1996, received 990 indexed citations . Written by James F. Moore covering the research area of Strategy and Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (565 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (261 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (163 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w77080684.