Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?
- Authors
- Pasi Sahlberg
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w77003767 →Countries where authors are citing Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?
This map shows the geographic impact of Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?
This network shows the impact of Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?.
About Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?
This paper, published in 2011, received 457 indexed citations . Written by Pasi Sahlberg covering the research area of Information Systems and Management and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (343 citations), Political Science and International Relations (122 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (110 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w77003767.