Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7688684 →Countries where authors are citing Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining
This map shows the geographic impact of Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining
This network shows the impact of Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining.
About Decision Tree Analysis on J48 Algorithm for Data Mining
This paper, published in 2013, received 266 indexed citations . Written by Neeraj Bhargava, Ritu Bhargava and Manish Mathuria covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (103 citations), Information Systems (58 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (53 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7688684.