Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives

1000 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 1000 indexed citations. Written by Niklas Luhmann covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (478 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (149 citations) and Information Systems and Management (141 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w76862308 →

Countries where authors are citing Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w76862308.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026