The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook

337 indexed citations
published 1968
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w76779624 →

Countries where authors are citing The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook.

About The human brain in figures and tables : a quantitative handbook

This paper, published in 1968, received 337 indexed citations . Written by S. M. Blinkov, Basil Haigh and Donald B. Lindsley. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (114 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (74 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (70 citations), Molecular Biology (39 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (35 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w76779624.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact