New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Stephen SpinelliRobert Adams
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w76742493 →Countries where authors are citing New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century
This map shows the geographic impact of New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century more than expected).
Fields of papers citing New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century
This network shows the impact of New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century.
About New Venture Creation Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century
This paper, published in 2014, received 548 indexed citations . Written by Stephen Spinelli and Robert Adams covering the research area of Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management of Technology and Innovation (357 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (141 citations), Accounting (131 citations), Business and International Management (103 citations) and Strategy and Management (100 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w76742493.