Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis
Impact in
- Epidemiology 464
- Oncology 211
Classified as
- Journal
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7661741 →Countries where authors are citing Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis
This map shows the geographic impact of Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis
This network shows the impact of Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis.
About Human Herpesviruses: Biology, Therapy, and Immunoprophylaxis
This paper, published in 2007, received 649 indexed citations . Written by Ann M. Arvin, Gabriella Campadelli‐Fiume, Edward S. Mocarski, Patrick S. Moore, Bernard Roizman, Richard J. Whitley and Koichi Yamanishi covering the research area of Epidemiology and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (464 citations), Oncology (211 citations), Immunology (136 citations), Molecular Biology (99 citations) and Infectious Diseases (85 citations). Published in Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7661741.