Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment.
- Authors
- Roy H. Maudsley
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7629881 →Countries where authors are citing Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment.
This map shows the geographic impact of Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment.
This network shows the impact of Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment..
About Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment.
This paper, published in 1972, received 383 indexed citations . Written by Roy H. Maudsley covering the research area of Cell Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (319 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (226 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (145 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7629881.