American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w76112578 →Countries where authors are citing American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification
This map shows the geographic impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification more than expected).
Fields of papers citing American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification
This network shows the impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification.
About American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification
This paper, published in 2021, received 234 indexed citations . Written by D. John Doyle, Amandeep Goyal, Pankaj Bansal and Emily H. Garmon covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (144 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (58 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (40 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w76112578.