Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger

410 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1973, received 410 indexed citations. Written by J Penáz covering the research area of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (341 citations), Surgery (154 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (143 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w75711934 →

Countries where authors are citing Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w75711934.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026