The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria
Impact in
- Journal
- Journal of Economic Literature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7567208 →Countries where authors are citing The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria
This map shows the geographic impact of The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria
This network shows the impact of The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria.
About The Value of the Ability to Deal with Disequilibria
This paper, published in 1974, received 864 indexed citations . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (512 citations), Sociology and Political Science (206 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (165 citations), Soil Science (90 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (88 citations). Published in Journal of Economic Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7567208.