Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis.
- Authors
- Pierre Jolicœur
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w75228572 →Countries where authors are citing Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis.
This map shows the geographic impact of Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis.
This network shows the impact of Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis..
About Size and shape variation in the painted turtle. A principal component analysis.
This paper, published in 1960, received 341 indexed citations . Written by Pierre Jolicœur covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation and Urology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (102 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (88 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (71 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w75228572.