Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment

1.5k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1992, received 1.5k indexed citations. Written by J. T. Houghton, B.A. Callander and Stuart Varney covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (940 citations), Atmospheric Science (587 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (227 citations). Published in Cambridge University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w7519564 →

Countries where authors are citing Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Climate change 1992 : the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w7519564.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026