Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition
- Journal
- Indiana University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7498166 →Countries where authors are citing Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition
This map shows the geographic impact of Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition
This network shows the impact of Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition.
About Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition
This paper, published in 1982, received 299 indexed citations . Written by Charles S. Peirce, Max H. Fisch, Christian J. W. Kloesel, Edward C. Moore and Nathan Houser covering the research area of Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Philosophy (153 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (97 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (39 citations). Published in Indiana University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7498166.