Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement
- Authors
- Richard L. Holmes
- Journal
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w7483976 →Countries where authors are citing Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement
This map shows the geographic impact of Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement
This network shows the impact of Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement.
About Computer-Assisted Quality Control in Tree-Ring Dating and Measurement
This paper, published in 1983, received 4.3k indexed citations . Written by Richard L. Holmes covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (3.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.5k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.8k citations). Published in UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w7483976.