Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74823067 →Countries where authors are citing Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions
This map shows the geographic impact of Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions
This network shows the impact of Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions.
About Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions
This paper, published in 2005, received 2.3k indexed citations . Written by R. A. Mittermeier, M. Timm Hoffman, John D. Pilgrim, Thomas M. Brooks, Cristina G. Mittermeier, John F. Lamoreux and Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (860 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (735 citations) and Ecology (715 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74823067.