Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w74739937 →Countries where authors are citing Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry
This map shows the geographic impact of Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry
This network shows the impact of Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry.
About Kaplan and Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences Clinical Psychiatry
This paper, published in 1994, received 688 indexed citations . Written by Harold Kaplan, Benjamin J. Sadock and Virginia A. Sadock. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (326 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (229 citations) and Social Psychology (122 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w74739937.